The initiative is non-assumption of Taoism, Lao-Tse claimed that exceeds not any obstacle could be doing. In Western culture inactivity is an enemy, there is no longer the courage to indulge in the Roman sense: the solitary and contemplative life has become abnormal, the time is almost all the work and the gaps are already covered by social needs Pre-Designed by the company and free time are needed to the system for purely economic logic of the market, and who is not working should star consuming. It 's a trap.
The otium to Latin literature. Being masters of themselves not pushing through the crowd to avoid being ingested into the system is pleasure to express myself moving between meditation and reading the time off from daily encounters with people from annoying cocky, contact with nature is awakening and asceticism . The Romans considered the lazy update of ancestral memory of the classics, live in the blood of deep reflection, Petrarch also argued this in his life De Lone, in which he invited to enjoy the fruits of solitude and intense bond with his ego being in contact with the primordial nature.
Living without the deceptions of modernity, winning, in the words Battiato, the horizontal line of matter, means introspective, declining the time and the courage with idleness, with the eastern noluttà dell'elogiarsi.
an empty space on the agenda today is a source of panic, not of happiness, for thinking themselves the truth could prove a dangerous slide into the precipice, not-doing has direct causative link with depression, is a paradox of ' modern West, is a revived Aristotelian dell'uroboro. The island of tranquility is the opposite of what should, ergo the obstacle course of modernity could be a way to ride the emptiness: the human type is modern bourgeois enterprising active lives in the frenzy of consumption in the extreme materialism, hypocrisy rampant in anything, this is a direct consequence of the free society in which freedom is second to having the individual is a commodity. The company's liquid Bauman mean the loss of the criteria of relevance, the product becomes living and economic production: the man is in the contract. Bauman took possession of the product in a social status: the system continually creates dissatisfaction in the consumer in order to encourage him to run stores to find the latest model of the product more fashionable. Descended into hell while Faust yearned eternity of the moment. We must therefore whether it has come at a time when you are trying to base the world on freedom, but slavery. The dichotomy is between freedom and happiness: What's especially? Within this question lies the destiny of man. Fyodor Dostoevsky taught us that "it is the freedom to make the man." Freedom is too difficult to understand with common means for this creative source of wonder and basically invincible. The man must also yearn for the unhappiness, desire against itself. Freedom is always rebellion against any established order that is subrogated to the mystery on the question of meaning. Only freedom and revolution. The modern West that imposing a rational order to the existing, however, it becomes real only at the price of the individual, ergo massif: what, in this sense, it is dystopian. The promise of happiness, according to Dostoevsky is the substance of slavery. The order, to eradicate freedom, must incardinated endemically in the socio-cultural mechanisms, the economy must be strictly planned and work together with it as well as leisure and creativity. This, according to the extraordinary Dostoevsky, can only be achieved and undermined the qualitative value of the individual. Huxley's novel Brave New World, presented a slave society in a rigid and perfect established order and at the same time happy that by amending the definition of "humanity" and a rigid manipulation of individual will, individuals are programmed as the modern PC, trained to want what they are indoctrinated. Individuals of "individual" have nothing: they are perfectly similar to each other and become robots. The system aims to undo the very revolutionary, rebellious, social stability and lack of differentiation of individuals, society is flat. Huxley's novel of 1932, I do not deviate too much from our society ultracapitalista notorious and fast. It should ride, first of all be mechanisms of narrow and precise, but never perfect in the modern world. You should be "men-book" Fahrenheit 451: "A minority of miserable crying in the wilderness." That group of men who, in the dystopian society envisioned by Ray Bradbury, in which there were firemen to burn books to eliminate the culture in an imaginary world in which he was only allowed to watch TV system, each had to memorize a book and called themselves the titles of the texts as they remembered. They had a specific function heroic fight against the approval.
The otium to Latin literature. Being masters of themselves not pushing through the crowd to avoid being ingested into the system is pleasure to express myself moving between meditation and reading the time off from daily encounters with people from annoying cocky, contact with nature is awakening and asceticism . The Romans considered the lazy update of ancestral memory of the classics, live in the blood of deep reflection, Petrarch also argued this in his life De Lone, in which he invited to enjoy the fruits of solitude and intense bond with his ego being in contact with the primordial nature.
Living without the deceptions of modernity, winning, in the words Battiato, the horizontal line of matter, means introspective, declining the time and the courage with idleness, with the eastern noluttà dell'elogiarsi.
an empty space on the agenda today is a source of panic, not of happiness, for thinking themselves the truth could prove a dangerous slide into the precipice, not-doing has direct causative link with depression, is a paradox of ' modern West, is a revived Aristotelian dell'uroboro. The island of tranquility is the opposite of what should, ergo the obstacle course of modernity could be a way to ride the emptiness: the human type is modern bourgeois enterprising active lives in the frenzy of consumption in the extreme materialism, hypocrisy rampant in anything, this is a direct consequence of the free society in which freedom is second to having the individual is a commodity. The company's liquid Bauman mean the loss of the criteria of relevance, the product becomes living and economic production: the man is in the contract. Bauman took possession of the product in a social status: the system continually creates dissatisfaction in the consumer in order to encourage him to run stores to find the latest model of the product more fashionable. Descended into hell while Faust yearned eternity of the moment. We must therefore whether it has come at a time when you are trying to base the world on freedom, but slavery. The dichotomy is between freedom and happiness: What's especially? Within this question lies the destiny of man. Fyodor Dostoevsky taught us that "it is the freedom to make the man." Freedom is too difficult to understand with common means for this creative source of wonder and basically invincible. The man must also yearn for the unhappiness, desire against itself. Freedom is always rebellion against any established order that is subrogated to the mystery on the question of meaning. Only freedom and revolution. The modern West that imposing a rational order to the existing, however, it becomes real only at the price of the individual, ergo massif: what, in this sense, it is dystopian. The promise of happiness, according to Dostoevsky is the substance of slavery. The order, to eradicate freedom, must incardinated endemically in the socio-cultural mechanisms, the economy must be strictly planned and work together with it as well as leisure and creativity. This, according to the extraordinary Dostoevsky, can only be achieved and undermined the qualitative value of the individual. Huxley's novel Brave New World, presented a slave society in a rigid and perfect established order and at the same time happy that by amending the definition of "humanity" and a rigid manipulation of individual will, individuals are programmed as the modern PC, trained to want what they are indoctrinated. Individuals of "individual" have nothing: they are perfectly similar to each other and become robots. The system aims to undo the very revolutionary, rebellious, social stability and lack of differentiation of individuals, society is flat. Huxley's novel of 1932, I do not deviate too much from our society ultracapitalista notorious and fast. It should ride, first of all be mechanisms of narrow and precise, but never perfect in the modern world. You should be "men-book" Fahrenheit 451: "A minority of miserable crying in the wilderness." That group of men who, in the dystopian society envisioned by Ray Bradbury, in which there were firemen to burn books to eliminate the culture in an imaginary world in which he was only allowed to watch TV system, each had to memorize a book and called themselves the titles of the texts as they remembered. They had a specific function heroic fight against the approval.
0 comments:
Post a Comment